top of page
dfd789c2-b86d-4e90-8ff7-b77083bb6c19.jpg

Album Reviews

download.jpg

Sincere

by Khalid, 2024

In 2017, he released his critically acclaimed freshman debut album, American Teen, which swept those of us in high school, still attempting to gain genuine understandings of love and ourselves, off our feet and right into the shared experiences of R&B artist Khalid. With popular songs such as “Coastin” and “Young Dumb and Broke,” the world knew the young artist was bound to come back swinging, which was precisely what he did with his sophomore album, Free Spirit, released in the summer of 2019. With songs such as “Talk” and “Better,” Khalid was found within the position of mainstream media recognition with consistent radio play for four years and two albums.  After that, his public statements via social media platforms about taking a break from music and social media created an evident absence in the Rhythm and Blues community of modern-day tunes. That was until his resurgence sent shockwaves to fans around the world and the return of our favorite lovesick lover boy.

 

Khalid released his latest album, Sincere, on August 2, 2024. The long-awaited third album came at an unprecedented time in which long-time fans found themselves in a collective position of heartbreak, new love, unrequited love, and feelings of loneliness and curiosity. All themes that the 26-year-old artist explores throughout the album. His singles from the project titled Please Don’t Fall In Love With Me, Adore U, Ground, and Heatstroke capture the bittersweet reality of heartache and moving forward while showing oneself grace about the struggle in the process to do so.

​

As an O.G. Khalid fan, I was over the moon with this release. I was, and to a point still am, one of many fans who found herself in that heartbrokenly confused yet curiously interested collective of loneliness. These days, it’s a familiar feeling, but Sincere just helps make it make sense from beginning to end. The singles mentioned earlier each gave us their own vibe and feel to what we could expect from Khalid’s latest drop: melancholic with upbeat tempos, soft-spoken drums with lyrics to match that make you feel like you’re floating in more ways than one, and compassion that gets that lovesick message across. The tracklist and my personal favorites(*) are as follows:

 

  1. “Adore U”

  2. “Everything We See”

  3. “Altitude*”

  4. “It’s All Good”

  5. “Broken*”

  6. “Dose”

  7. “Please Don’t Fall In Love With Me”

  8. “Breathe”

  9. “Ground*”

  10. “Who’s There To Pick Me Up*”

  11. “Tainted”

  12. “Long Way Home”

  13. “Heatstroke”

  14. “Sincere”

  15. “Owe To You”

  16. “Decline”

​

Khalid, whose vulnerability and honesty in music play prominent roles, presents listeners with a story to tell: the trials and errors that can likely come with falling in love, being unsure of where the journey of love is heading, and the ultimate decision to leave and choose your heart and yourself. Altitude, Broken, Ground, and Who’s There To Pick Me Up have become both my personal and most relatable favorite songs from the album. The order and organization of Sincere’s tracklist are admirable, and regardless of what order your favorite songs are in, they speak the same truth and experience the same collective emotions and realities, such as those of the fans and times when the album was released. The rollercoaster of emotions my top picks take me on starts the exact same way a typical rollercoaster would: steady in the beginning, a wild ride the whole way through, and ending with frizzy hair, dried lips, glossy water-streaked eyes, and asking yourself, “What’s next?” The type of love, imagery, and personal attention to one’s feelings about love and the kind of love that exists in the world makes this album so unique and even more impactful. An impact that hasn’t left the gorgeously orchestrated throatbox that is Khalid’s and the music that can make you smile through the tears and learn to find joy in loving love after heartbreak.

 

-Soleil Jones

CSU Stanislaus

Magdalena_Bay_-_Imaginal_Disk.png

Imaginal Disk

by Magdalena Bay, 2024

Aesthetics Never Die, They Just Come Back Weirder

​

Magdalena Bay is the synthpop duo consisting of Mica Tenenbaum and Matthew Lewin, who began collaborating with each other in 2016, but caught mainstream attention with the release of their first full-length album in 2021, Mercurial World. The album borrowed heavily from the sonic stylings of ‘80s synthpop outfits, capturing the retro sound with their own personal flourishes. The record consisted of straightforward synthpop bangers, but the creativity of their production and the bombast of their instrumentals set them apart from other artists also trying to resurrect that era.  Their popularity was further aided along by the use of vaporwave-inspired aesthetics in their promotional materials, music videos, and album art. The use of these aesthetics and their music’s retro sound evoked a certain nostalgia for an “age that never was,” specifically for those who weren’t even born in time to experience that technological optimism of the ‘80s. 

​

And so, the duo returns three years later with Imaginal Disk, a record which pushes the limits of their creativity with its production and soundscapes, pulls from a wider variety of retro genres, and gets more imaginative and dynamic with its songwriting and lyricism–resulting in an overall more cohesive project because of it. 

​

A great part of its cohesiveness lies in the album’s core concept: a fictional therapeutic treatment called “True Blue,” which is introduced in its third track, “True Blue Interlude.” The treatment draws from the uncanny and cult-like self-help scams of the ‘80s and ‘90s to promise the narrator a journey towards true self-discovery, offered as a cure to her issues with self-conceptualization and depression illustrated on the first two tracks, “She Looked Like Me” and “Killing Time.”

​

In “She Looked Like Me” the narrator conceptualizes herself through the lens of others—the expectations of her family, of her nation, of her peers. She sees the construct of herself that’s been built by others and recognizes it as not being her true self. This then, in “Killing Time,” leads to her depression over the feeling of having wasted her life being inauthentic and pondering over the concept of “dead time.” The latter track builds up to roaring synthesize and messy guitar and key solos, which sonically depicts that panic the narrator feels over lost time living in the metaphorical wasteland. In fact, Imaginal Disk is at its best when it shows a willingness to get loud, abrasive, grimy, and unnerving to contrast the heavenly pop choruses the duo perfected on their first outing.

​

Take the album’s sixth track, “Fear, Sex,” where plinky, almost plucked-harp-sounding synths beautify this track throughout, especially in the opening where they’re almost sinister and foreboding. This is contrasted with, appropriately for a track with lyrics discussing “voices in your head,” chopped up and pitch-shifted vocal samples serving as some of the instrumentation, including some heavily distorted samples in the outro, which give the impression of deep, boisterous, and disturbing laughter. 

​

The eighth track, “Watching T.V.,” implements contrast in a different way, starting off as one of the quieter moments on the record with its sparse instrumentation. This section features some disquieting lyrics, such as “If you wanna be clean/Scrub until the blood comes out/Get the spots in between/Slip your skin right off and hang it out.” The lyrics reflect this being the point of the True Blue’s treatment where the narrator dissociates entirely from her physical self, in the classic sci-fi trope of becoming “one with the machine.” However, this track builds into another serene and gorgeous layer of synths alongside a transcendental keyboard solo. Both of these elements are intentionally marred with glitches and the effect of a skipping CD, making something disturbing out of this would-be magical moment. The beauty of self-discovery and finding love gives way to, according to this song’s lyrics, “meeting the monsters inside you,” depicting the painful side of self-reflection the narrator wishes to avoid.

​

Even when Magdalena Bay aims for something more accessible and catchy on this set of tracks, they’re applying these techniques in less extreme ways. A straightforward dance-pop banger like “Death & Romance,” with its clean piano melodies, glimmering synths, and funky basslines, features some atmospheric and eerie whirring in the background during the verses. In my favorite cut off of the album, “That’s My Floor,” Magdalena Bay really pushes the question of how far you can mutilate a party banger to the point where you could no longer play it at a party without disturbing the guests. A real grimey and distorted bass groove digs into this track as synths soar throughout it. However, the chorus gives way to some extra loud and blaring distortion of all of its instrumental elements—the synths, bass, and guitar. One can almost envision, as the track’s name implies, a violent conquest over the dance “floor,” with the narrator completely losing herself in convulsions as the song closes out with a screechy and chaotic guitar solo, married with Mica’s carefree and sweet “la la la’s.”

​

Unfortunately, I felt the creative energy die off in the final two tracks of the record, “Angel on a Satellite” and “The Ballad of Matt and Mica.” “Angel on a Satellite” is much too sparse for my liking, as it relies mainly on an acoustic guitar, bongo beat, and some piano for its instrumentals. The usual synth flourishes are present, alongside some sampled strings. However, it’s missing the contrast that’s so essential to the album’s other sections, where the beauty is hidden among or born out of its harsher and more experimental uses of electronics. 

​

“The Ballad of Matt and Mica” simply does not do it for me either, despite featuring that contrast between glistening synthpop and distorted electronics. They clash in a way that I find unpleasant, as Mica sings a refrain to the point of obnoxiousness. Its discontinuity listens like a bonus track, and not a proper culmination of the record’s ideas sonically or lyrically. Even “Angel on a Satellite,” though I’m a bit cold on it, arguably better renders the narrative involving the True Blue treatment, as it ultimately overpowers the narrator’s sense of self and results in her total integration with the digital world, becoming pacified by its sedative allure.

​

Despite these weaker closing tracks, Imaginal Disk still explores new soundscapes and reaches wider emotional ranges than was captured on Magdalena Bay’s previous work. The record’s highs are euphoric and bone-chilling, and its lows are still, for the most part, pleasant. Its narrative serving as a satire of self-help, and the ever-present promise of a cure-all treatment, is expertly layered in as well. If you’re looking for a pop record that’s willing to take risks and isn’t afraid to get loud, abrasive, and truly alternative, while still retaining the core saccharine appeal of synthpop, this is a must-listen.

 

8.5/10

 

- Nix Carbone-Deep

CSU Stanislaus

Book Reviews

image.png

Opposable Thumbs

by Matt Singer, 2023

There is not much that I do not know about Gene Siskel (1946-1999) and Roger Ebert (1942-2013). To me, they were the apex predators of film criticism; and during my adolescence, I would lay at the foot of my grandmother’s bed and eagerly watch both of them verbally duke it out, sparring like Ali and Frazier without the gloves and the muscle mass. For thirty minutes, they would bicker like an elderly married couple and regularly talk over each other, constantly disagree, and then let their enthralled audience know if they gave the films they were reviewing a thumbs up or a thumbs down. The format of their show was simple and effective: two men, sitting across from each other, and talking. But, what made them compelling to me was not so much their oftentimes bitter banter about the cinema but more so their ability to speak about all sorts of movies with intelligence and passion. They loved the movies just as much as I did, and they ultimately became an influence in my life and my career as a writer and a teacher; and it is Matt Singer’s newest book, Opposable Thumbs: How Siskel & Ebert Changed Movies Forever, that proves I was not the only person enamored by their spirited dynamic.

 

Singer starts his work by speaking about how these two men got their start: Siskel was a writer with the Chicago Tribune and Ebert was a writer with the Chicago Sun-Times. Both of them started out as staff writers but worked their way up to becoming full-time film critics. Ebert was first and Siskel was second but was hired because Ebert was becoming more well-respected, which ended up being lucrative for the newspaper (Ebert would eventually win a Pulitzer Prize for his criticism). In essence, their relationship started as contentious and both of them, being the fierce competitors that they were, frequently attempted to one up each other when they had the opportunity. This led to a heated rivalry that was both antagonistic and, surprisingly enough, marketable. Producers involved in programming for the local Chicago public television station, WTTW, came up with a unique idea for a show where Siskel and Ebert would just talk about movies. Opening Soon was the first iteration of Siskel and Ebert’s show and it was a complete disaster in that the two of them were hardly photogenic and they had no sense of how to be in front of a camera; however, Thea Flaum, their producer, still saw something worth continuing and thus the age of televised film criticism began.

 

Siskel and Ebert were together for just about twenty-five years and their relationship started out with a great deal of anger, frustration, and an incessant need for one-upmanship. Although their vitriol on camera seemed staged, it was not. They fought and argued and tried to get more screen time than the other, so much so their producers were led to near insanity. And yet they stayed together and, with time, grew to respect and appreciate and, on some level, love one another as both colleagues and friends. There were multiple iterations of the show picked up by several distributors throughout the years but, no matter what happened, they stayed together not just out of necessity but because of a genuine caring that both of them had for one another. They would work together until Gene Siskel’s untimely death in 1999 at the age of 53. Ebert would later have a lucrative career on his own and, to his credit, he attempted to keep the format alive but he himself would get cancer, which became so serious he lost his voice and a good portion of his jaw. Until his death in 2013, Ebert would stay in the public eye by writing books, working as an online critic, and going on talk shows to speak about his health struggles. He was also the subject of an extraordinary documentary, Life Itself, which showed the world how strong-willed and strong-headed he could be while also being completely devoted to his wife, Chaz, who has kept him (and on some level Siskel) alive on such venues as YouTube.

 

Opposable Thumbs surely is about the love of movies but it also is successful in that it accurately speaks about how ego sometimes gets in the way of a good thing. These two men, filled with convictions, opinions, and piss and vinegar may have started as enemies but with time, patience, and

routine grew to become an unstoppable team devoted to making sure that all of us spent our hard-earned money on good films rather than dreck. Singer does an excellent job in providing a thorough history of both Siskel and Ebert, while at the same time recognizing the distinct personalities of each and how the individually changed the face of both movies and criticism for generations to come.

​

-Dr. Douglas C. MacLeod, Jr.

150247395.jpg

The Tainted Cup

by Robert Jackson Bennett, 2024

The Tainted Cup comes to us from Robert Jackson Bennett, the Shirley Jackson and Edgar Award-winning author perhaps best known for Foundryside. When an Imperial officer is murdered in the most peculiar of fashions, with a tree growing right from his body, an equally peculiar investigator is called in. She is none other than Ana Dolabra, an eccentric yet brilliant inspector who wears a blindfold to dull her sight and strengthen her other senses. At her side is her newly appointed apprentice Dinios Kol, an engraver with the uncanny ability to memorize anything verbatim. His only issues: he cheated his way into the position and he’s terrified Ana will find him out, and his dyslexia makes memorizing vital information near-impossible. Secrets abound as the pair travel to the city of Talagray, where sea monsters threaten to wreak havoc at any moment. The case unfolds in the most unexpected of ways, with the murder weapon of choice being a fatally contagious grass.

​

Equal parts Sherlockian mystery and solarpunk fantasy, The Tainted Cup awed me with its singular, lush setting, unforgettable characters, and unpredictable twists. Set in a world with a highly biological and scientific magic system, this novel felt entirely out of this world and yet somehow still comforting. Even with the blood, murder, and mystery, I might even compare it in many ways to the cozy fantasy subgenre. Amidst all the tension, high-stakes, and twists, Bennett managed to expertly weave moments of softness, the mundane, and even solace. The characters are undoubtedly the driving force at the heart of this story. Ana and Dinios are my personal favorite reincarnation of the Sherlock and Watson mystery-solving duo, with contrasting yet charismatic personalities, complex pasts and secrets, and a laugh-out-loud funny and strange dynamic.

​

Some of the most unique and engaging elements of this read are the various scientific/magical modifications and, I think it goes without saying, the sea monsters. In Bennett’s wonderfully wrought world, people like Dinios can modify themselves for any number of reasons. In his case, Dinios modified his memory to become an engraver and provide himself–and his family–with income. Other characters are modified in size, lifespan, or strength, but all face individual consequences. Dinios is forced to remember everything, even the most terrible things in his life and career. Many engravers go on to lose their minds, to suffer migraines and other afflictions. Other modified individuals can live long but are cursed to grow eternally, and in time become almost unable to move. The sea monsters, the Leviathans for which the series is named Shadow of the Leviathan, are haunting in the way of Godzilla. They endeavor endlessly to ruin the walls erected by humans and storm their cities, and the humans endeavor endlessly to erect the walls and safeguard their cities again and again.

​

Any book with murder, mayhem, and monsters is sure to have hard-hitting themes, and The Tainted Cup is no different. At its core, this is a story about class structures, empire, and one’s duty to where one lives and works. A quote often repeated throughout is, “You are the empire.” With monsters imperiling them at every turn, the characters in this world must question how they can and should defend their home and who truly is the empire. It’s a world as corrupt as our own, and Dinios uncovers many dark conspiracies and lies on his path to finding the truth.

​

Dinios himself was my perfect main character, hitting the perfect balance between unexpected and relatable. His dyslexia was a vital part of the story, and I was so glad to see this representation being accurately and respectfully depicted on the page. Dinios is also queer, with a small but beautiful romance subplot. It’s not everyday that a reader gets a diverse fantasy and mystery rolled into one, and for that alone, The Tainted Cup is well worth a read.

​

This novel is sure to please fans of peculiar settings and even more peculiar mysteries. Chock full of spellbindingly eerie elements, humor, and surprises that even the most expert of amateur investigators won’t be able to solve while reading, The Tainted Cup cemented itself on my list of favorite reads of 2024–and possibly all-time. I’d recommend it vehemently to anyone who loves master-apprentice stories, solarpunk worlds, or Sherlock. Bennett is set to bring Ana’s and Dinios’s adventures back to shelves on February 26, 2025 with A Drop of Corruption. Add it to your Goodreads TBR here. The Tainted Cup is without a doubt a five-star read for me, and I hope it will be for you, too.

​

- Fiona Hansen

Arizona State University

9780593707463.jpg

I Will Never Leave You

by Kara A. Kennedy, 2024

Kara A. Kennedy’s debut comes in the form of I Will Never Leave You, a Young Adult speculative thriller about the haunting impact of toxic relationships. We follow Maya, a teen girl trapped in a less-than-healthy relationship with her girlfriend, Alana. Maya finally summons up the courage to break up with Alana and end their tumultuous not-so-love story once and for all. But then Alana goes missing. And when Maya realizes it might just be her fault, she becomes haunted by their strange bond in a whole new way. Because Alana isn’t ready to let go of Maya, even in death. She threatens Maya with an ultimatum: if Maya doesn’t help her possess another girl, Alana will frame her for her murder. Along the way, Maya encounters terror, hardship, loneliness, fraught familial relationships, and maybe, if she dares, love. 

​

This is the kind of book that will haunt you long after reading it. Tightly paced, eerily atmospheric, and best of all, sapphic, I Will Never Leave You is, in part, a hair-raising exploration of the frightening fanaticism surrounding true crime. I especially loved how Kennedy dove into how the media flocks to cases regarding young, white, wealthy women as compared to other cases. Being a private school student with a semi-famous mom, Alana’s case hits the news with a boom. The book is one part true-crime mystery, one part speculative thriller, one part coming-of-age story, and one part sapphic romance. If you’re not hooked by that alone, I don’t know what to tell you.

​

One special thing about this thriller is that it offers vital sapphic representation on shelves without shying away from the imperfection of Alana and Maya’s relationship. Having accurate representation on the page is one thing, but Kennedy’s daringness to explore the bony underside and haunting aftermath of toxic relationships is another thing entirely. Kennedy gives Maya’s journey the utmost care, as we go through the ups and downs of not just being haunted by your dead ex-girlfriend, but also being a Queer, teenage girl.


So much of this story resonated with me, as it will with many other readers. Maya’s fear of the future and her fight to gain control of her life and heart. Her anxiety and panic disorders. The blistering Southern California setting. The struggles of being in a Queer relationship at a young age, and thus, never quite being taken seriously. That being said, this is a novel that should not be cracked upon without the reader knowing what they’re getting into. I Will Never Leave You centers, of course, around toxicity, manipulation, and emotional abuse. The message that this book will bring to young readers is so incredible and so important. Emotional abuse can happen in any relationship and at any age, and that wasn’t something I’d considered much before Kennedy opened my eyes. But this book isn’t just for YA readers. In fact, it could appeal to lovers of adult thrillers, mysteries, and ghost stories, and I think it would make a stunning adaptation to the screen. 

​

Every word of this novel sings with rage—and beauty. Kennedy’s prose shines brightly, promising a bright future ahead for this debut author. There was a clear, moody atmosphere that only enhanced the riveting, taught, and twisty plot. I’m happy to be sharing this review as we approach Spooky Season, as this is the perfect September read, just eerie enough to make you keep the lights on while you read but also with the warmth of a Los Angeles summer.


2024 is the year of creepy sapphics reads, and I couldn’t be happier about it. If you’re on the hunt for more stories in the vein of I Will Never Leave You, look no further than authors Hayley Dennings, Courtney Gould, and Kayla Cottingham. 


- Fiona Hansen
Arizona State University

Movie Reviews

e0f43c85-84d5-4393-9abd-aa5ea8f2f8cc.jpg

The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes

Snow lands on top.

​

Four pivotal words distinguish yet another of Suzanne Collins’ dystopian masterpieces; it has finally made it to the big screen—the prequel offspring of The Hunger Games trilogy. President Snow’s story of youth and insatiability takes center stage in The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes. Divided into three main overtures (with a brief prelude to set the stage for a war-wounded world), the film is a true testament to the potential of adaptation. Thank you, Francis Lawrence, for bringing Collins’ vision to life once again.

​

The film’s main events pick up at the start of the 10th annual Hunger Games, following the Dark Days of war. This year will be different from the past nine; this time, the bright graduating students of the Capitol are acting as the Games’ first-ever mentors. The goal for Panem: to turn the Games into a spectacle. The goal for Coriolanus Snow: to win the Plinth Prize and restore his family’s financial security. Although the Snows have maintained appearances well, it is quickly made apparent that they are nearly destitute. Snow finds himself mentoring the District 12 female tribute by the name of Lucy Gray Baird. Lucy Gray is a performer at heart, a member of the gypsy-like Covey band in her district (although self-identified as drifters), and a willing participant in her mentor’s craftsmanship of her public persona…after a little persuasion on his part, that is. Motivations aside, the two must navigate the Games together—only to find that most dangers exist outside the fellow tributes. I am stopping my summary there, as this is a part of my spoiler-free sections.

​

Packed with a talented cast ensemble, Songbirds and Snakes was set to be a memorable premiere. Strong performances reigned all around, but perhaps the most powerful ones belong to Tom Blyth as Coriolanus Snow, Rachel Zegler as Lucy Gray Baird, Josh Andrés Rivera as Sejanus Plinth, and Viola Davis as Dr. Gaul.

​

It is now that I will offer a spoiler warning. If you have not yet seen the film and have never read the book, you may wish to skip to the end! I will label the ending to the spoiler zone.

​

Rachel Zegler’s performance in the film succeeds in giving Lucy Gray a new kind of vibrancy. From her expressive singing style (a pained kind of swan song with every lyric) to her bold dialogue with Snow, she is a heroine worthy of the vivid dresses she wears. In fact, I would argue that she gains more autonomy in the film as opposed to its textual counterpart, in which a lot of who she is and how her mind works remains a mystery. Of course, adapting a book like this one that is rife with subtlety must sacrifice some mysteries for the sake of not confusing the viewers, especially when the pacing of events is as fast as the Hunger Games entails. In this new cinematic view of Lucy Gray, we gain more insights into her active participation in the Games, later leading to a more distinct image of her as a victor.

​

Dr. Gaul is no exception to the vibrancy of film portrayal. The extensive costumery and makeup alone create a kind of serpentine chaos in her appearance—you never know when Dr. Gaul might strike. Davis expertly taps into the eerie nature of Dr. Gaul in both her line delivery and mannerisms. Her first appearance in the classroom above the students/mentors is striking in her horror film-esque stillness at the start and her riddle-patterned speech. It is here that I would like to note an interesting observation: the singular blue eye of Dr. Gaul is quite the color match to Coriolanus’ piercing blue eyes. Perhaps such a decision was meant to point to the villainy and chaos lurking beneath the surface for Coriolanus? Or maybe it is simply a hint of his future internship with Gaul, working with her directly as the game maker? All the same, it provokes an interesting take on the phrase, “Eyes are the windows to the soul.”

​

In juxtaposition to Gaul’s Capitol identity is the conflicted role of Sejanus Plinth. A martyr-in-training, Sejanus counteracts the influence of a character like Gaul upon Snow’s morality. Sejanus is a vocal dissenter of the Games and their cruelty, having grown up in District 2 himself. He has a distinct obsession with doing the right thing, usually in a radical way—similar in fact, to Gale Hawthorne’s kind of radicalism in thoughts and actions. His eventual demise is a fitting end to the powerlessness that comes with living in the Districts. Snow’s reaction to the results of his betrayal is one of his most memorable performances throughout the film—a slow transition from stoic apathy to a guilt-ridden breakdown. Although this was an excellent portrayal of Snow, I cannot help but wonder if they should have better incorporated the rationalization of his inner monologue from the book, in which he asks himself, “What choice did you have?” (Collins 472) This line is an apt example of the “good guy” complex, with its seemingly pure intentions that often conceal a subtle manipulation of the truth.

​

Tom Blyth’s performance as Coriolanus “Coryo” Snow is an excellent portrayal of the enigma that the character is. Where the book seeks to convey a kind of unfolding of his true nature, the film seems to convey the actual shaping of it in real time. His intentionality, like Lucy Gray’s, is more apparent in the film than in the novel (likely as an aid to those who have not read the book, who may have trouble tracking the faster events). He does not make a split-second decision to tamper with Gaul’s snakes in the film, but rather seeks them out and creates a prolonged plan to do so. Additionally, Coriolanus finds a way to aid Lucy Gray in attacking the other tributes, which is an entirely new side to his investment in the Games. Snow truly does live up to Lucy Gray’s labeling of him as a “rebel.” Similar to the novel, it can be difficult to determine exactly when Snow’s loyalties shift. Perhaps it’s when he uses the jabberjay against Sejanus.

​

I think perhaps the real shift occurs when he’s in the Hob during his time as a peacekeeper and finds himself drifting away from the song Lucy Gray wrote for him, eventually leading to the climactic flipping of the switch in his altercation with Billy Taupe, Mayfair, and the others. The moment when the switch flips for Coriolanus is convincing, but I find it interesting that up until that moment he seems to be far more empathy-inducing than sociopathic, the sociopathy being an impression of him that I found to be more notable in the book. Of course, I am still unsure whether to diagnose him as a sociopath or a good old-fashioned narcissist. Maybe Lawrence has determined it for me, and I should embrace the clear narcissism of Coriolanus’ motivations and quick changes in perspective. No matter the consensus, it is easy for me to say that Blyth crafted an excellent portrayal of a despicable character reaching the limits of his redeemable character, and facing the inner conflict that comes with that point in time. From his minute expressions to his clever manipulations, Blyth shows us the snake disguised as a flower.

​

Before I conclude my spoiler-filled review, I want to discuss two pivotal scenes: the moment Lucy Gray saves him after the arena bombings and his final attempts to kill her. How ironic that flames nearly burn him up and that his love—or rather, object of obsession—seems to disappear into the trees, amid the symphony of mockingjay song. What a chilling prelude to his end at the hands of the “girl on fire” and her rebel title of  “the mockingjay.” It is this selection of parallels in particular that evokes my only true critique of the film adaptation: they should never have cut out Lucy Gray’s line that “The show’s not over until the mockingjay sings.”

​

End of Spoiler Warning

​

Let’s talk about the general symbolism of the film! Symbols are everywhere you look, even in the title. Lucy Gray in her colorful array of showmanship presents a visual of plumage, which matches her appreciation for birds and ironically fits her inclinations towards snakes as well. The vitality that Lucy Gray represents crafts an image of Spring, whereas Snow himself symbolizes the gradual frost of winter’s approach. In fact, that approach seems to reach an interesting turning point when we hear the line, “Do you hear that? It's the sound of Snow falling.” While it is acceptable that Lucy Gray and Coriolanus pose as two opposing seasons, might it be a stretch to suggest they represent two halves to the identity of Katniss Everdeen? Maybe it is, but I’m going to throw that suggestion out there all the same.

​

Before going into watching the film, I want to point out a few things. First, Coriolanus’ name. His first name alone means “victorious” and fascinatingly enough, Coriolanus is the title of a Shakespeare play. In the play, which is based on historical events, Roman general Coriolanus makes his name defeating an enemy army and defending Rome, then later faces banishment and a tragic end due to his own actions. Second, I want to point out the symbol of his grandmother’s roses. The scent of roses is known to conceal other things in both The Hunger Games Trilogy and this latest addition to the franchise, although it is only explicitly mentioned in the books. How interesting then, that some scenes throughout the film contain roses while for others they are nowhere in sight. Additionally, the colors of the roses he is either wearing or gifting vary in color, ranging from white to red to yellow…

​

The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes is a unique addition to Collins’ franchise not only because of its different characters and place in time but also because of its notable musical elements. Zegler gives an exemplary musical performance as Lucy Gray, creating a soundtrack that is beautiful and haunting in its lyrics. Her rendition of “The Hanging Tree” sheds new light on its impact upon President Snow during Katniss’ age of revolution. What that must have done to Snow hearing the music reborn after so many years, with its clear connection to his own life and the things he witnessed alongside Lucy Gray. The soundtrack of the film complements its cinematography very well, effectively returning to the coloring and sounds of the original franchise. Details such as the stark peacekeeper uniforms and the colors of the Capitol flag present an effective contrast to the persistent grime on the tribute’s faces and the dimmer, more faded coloring of most of the urban environments. A colorful character like Lucy Gray truly stands out in her environment of a post-war Capitol just beginning to lean into its fascination with luxury and whimsy.

​

There are some notable differences between the novel and the film, mainly in its pacing. Events leading up to the Games are condensed and sped up a great deal, and the sequence of what happens to certain characters and tributes is altered for the sake of cinematic intensity and easy transitions. Personally, I have no objections to the alterations that were made for the sake of time and clarity. I do think Clemensia should have been given greater complexity and screen time to mirror her role in the book, but I understand the need to avoid drawing the audience’s attention away from its leading actors.

​

The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes asks its characters and viewers alike “Why the Hunger Games?” Why should a punishment be made into a spectacle? Why has the Capitol deemed it a punishment deserved by the Districts? And how in the world did we reach a place in which the arena’s ironic repetition of “Enjoy the show!” has actually come to fruition? Coriolanus and Lucy Gray’s story of mentorship and conflicted morals presents a fascinating, and wholly entertaining, dissection of the Hobbes and Rousseau debate come to life: is man naturally good or naturally evil?

​

The longest film yet in the franchise, beating Catching Fire by a sliver of twelve minutes, Songbirds and Snakes is worth every minute. I highly recommend this film, both for the avid THG fan seeking greater depth to the lore and for the film buff seeking an intense and entertaining showcase. This film has revived the ominous magic of immersing oneself in a dystopian world that mirrors elements of our own reality. It is not lacking in some self-indulgent fun though. Jason Schwartzman as Lucky Flickerman echoes the laughter-inducing nature of Stanley Tucci’s Caesar Flickerman, creating a kind of dark humor element to the Games that provides levity to its dystopian intensity. Embracing my full bias, I am rating this film 5/5 stars. You can be sure I will be seeing this again. For those of you that have not yet purchased your tickets…

​

Enjoy the show.

​

-Schuyler Becker 

CSU Stanislaus 

image.png

Gran Turismo

Gran Turismo, one of the most thrilling films of the year, is based on a true story about a sim racer who receives a one-in-a-million opportunity to attend Gran Turismo Academy and potentially become a professional race car driver. Gran Turismo is set to deliver an exhilarating experience that will captivate both gaming enthusiasts and film lovers. Being a lifelong "Gran Turismo" fan, I could not have been more excited to witness the transformation of this beloved game into a captivating cinematic experience. This film was released on August 25, 2023 and was directed by Neill Blomkamp, and produced by Columbia Pictures, PlayStation Productions, and 2.0 Entertainment.

 

Behold this cinematic masterpiece that unfolds the captivating story of a true legend, none other than the influential Jann Mardenborough, a young man whose achievements will leave you in awe. In his formative years, an unstoppable passion for cars and the exhilarating world of racing took root within him. From the very first "Gran Turismo" video game, he set out on a captivating journey, devotedly engaging in its virtual realm ever since. "Gran Turismo" is a game that transcends the realm of mere average racing experiences. It is regarded as the epitome of legitimacy, a perfect example of a true driving simulator. The game masterfully captures the essence of each car’s unique dynamics and the exhilarating sensation of being behind the wheel. The level of precision in the game is truly remarkable, allowing expert "Gran Turismo" players to discern the subtle differences between each car within the game. Due to Mardenborough’s exceptional lap times within the game, he was selected as a participant in the highly competitive GT Academy, which could make or break his lifelong dreams of becoming a professional racer driver.

 

Archie Madekwe portrays the main role, Jann. Orlando Bloom plays Danny Moore, a Nissan marketing executive. Matty Davis, another GT Academy driver and Jann's adversary, is played by Darren Barnet. David Harbour stars as Jack Salter, a former racer who trains Jann at GT Academy. Jann's father, Steve Mardenborough, is played by Djimon Hounsou. Jann's mother, Lesley Mardenborough, is played by Geri Halliwell. Kazunori Yamauchi, the inventor of the "Gran Turismo" video game, is played by Takehiro Hira. Audrey, Jann's crush, is played by Maeve Courtier-Lilley. Coby Mardenborough, Jann's brother, is played by Daniel Puig. Josha Stradowski plays Nicholas Capa, a cunning and malicious driver; Jann's competition. 

 

Jacques Jouffret serves as the cinematographer for the film, with Sony investing $60 million in its production. Gran Turismo has achieved an impressive milestone, generating $100 million in box office revenue worldwide. It is worth noting the incredible soundtrack in this film. The song "Paranoid" by Black Sabbath effectively puts viewers in the emotions experienced by the characters. Kenny G's saxophone skills have the power to deeply move audiences, allowing them to experience a range of feelings even through a screen. It is noteworthy to account that the real Jann Mardenborough actually plays his own stunt double in the film!

 

The movie wraps up by showcasing the real Jann Mardenborough and provides insights into his remarkable journey. I am absolutely pleased to give this movie a perfect rating of 10/10. It was truly an exceptional film, undoubtedly the best I have seen this year. In fact, I found it so intriguing that I have watched it twice following my initial viewing. I have eagerly shared it with friends and family, and they have collectively acknowledged that this captivating and compelling narrative is one that deserves to be experienced by all.

 

- Martina Bekasha 

CSU Stanislaus

dp3_1sht_digital_srgb_ka_swords_v5_resized.jpg

Deadpool & Wolverine

Directed by Shawn Levy, 2024

With the widespread popularity of Deadpool 2, and the massive amount of excitement surrounding the release of Deadpool & Wolverine, I tried to temper my expectations for the newest release of the franchise. The film is the third of the Deadpool series, and the first to come out since Disney acquired 20th Century Studios in 2019—a move that opened the doors for characters whose film rights were previously held by Studios to appear within the Marvel Cinematic Universe, including their titular characters. While many were excited by the possibilities this acquisition might bring to the MCU, some (myself included) were more skeptical about how exactly Marvel planned on incorporating these characters into their film universe, and what they would do with them once they did. Deadpool, in particular, had the potential to be folded into the MCU in a spectacularly lackluster way. With the new film being distributed by Disney, there were concerns the film’s content might have to be dialed down in this, and future, installments. After all, Disney’s brand is much more family-friendly, and no MCU film prior has ever gone higher than their typical PG-13 rating.

​

Fortunately for anyone who was worried about Disney’s potential censorship, there is absolutely nothing dialed down about this film. If you are looking for a raunchy superhero film with tons of heavy violence and sexual humor, Deadpool & Wolverine certainly delivers on that front. The film still maintains its anticipated R rating–more than earning the warning within the opening alone. The movie opens with Deadpool (Ryan Reynolds) tracking down Wolverine’s (Hugh Jackman) grave (the same grave the 2017 film Logan leaves off on), believing that Wolverine can’t truly be dead due to his regenerative powers. To his disappointment, he finds the grave and Wolverine’s still very dead skeleton, only to be interrupted by a group of agents sent to hunt him down. The two sides fight it out to NSYNC’s “Bye Bye Bye” as the opening credits play, with clips of Deadpool doing the original choreo for the song interspersed between the gory, sometimes suggestive violence.

​

The opening provides a good baseline for most of what the film has to offer: plenty of violence, gore, vulgar humor, and a fun soundtrack featuring plenty of throwback tunes utilized to both amuse the audience, and tug at their feelings of nostalgia. The soundtrack in particular stood out to me for how excellently it worked within the film. From “Iris,” by The Goo Goo Dolls, that plays over lust-at-first-sight scenes, to the version of Madonna’s “Like a Prayer” that plays during the film’s climax, each song is featured in a way that adds something to the film—whether that’s something humorous, nostalgic, or both.

​

The nostalgia is not just present in the soundtrack, either. Deadpool & Wolverine references several 20th Century Studios films from before Disney’s acquisition, with many characters from the aforementioned Marvel films making cameos throughout. The movie pulls a fun bait-and-switch with Chris Evans’ cameo, building up a potential Captain America appearance. Deadpool and the audience are goaded into expecting some version of the famous Avengers character to show up–only to be met with Evans taking up the role of Johnny Storm from Fantastic Four (2005) once more. In addition to Evans’ brief cameo, the film also brings back Elektra (Jennifer Garner), Blade (Wesley Snipes), and Laura Kinney, a.k.a. X-23 (Dafne Keen). The film also officially introduces Channing Tatum as Gambit—a role he had been in talks to play multiple times, but never quite happened. Disney marks these characters’ debut, or return, to the big screen, fighting alongside Deadpool and Wolverine for one final hurrah. With so many characters being brought back from previously 20th Century Studios-owned Marvel films, the movie evokes nostalgia for that era of superhero films many longtime viewers and fans still long for. Rather than just introducing Deadpool, the film feels more like a celebration of all of Studio’s contributions to bringing Marvel characters to the big screen before they fully transition Deadpool as a central part of the MCU.

​

Alongside the love given to older Marvel films, what gives this movie a strong heart is its more serious moments. Hugh Jackman’s performance is particularly moving, as he portrays a Wolverine that blames himself for the loss of all his friends back in his home world–a world where all the other X-Men were killed while he was out drinking. Most audience sympathy for Wolverine is garnered by his feeble attempts to move on after recognizing he was given empty promises that his world could be fixed. There are just enough serious moments woven throughout the film to draw in the audience’s emotions without shifting the tone of the film too far away from its comedic foundations. Not only are the serious, emotional scenes well done, they also blend well with the rest of the comedic scenes. The tonal transitions in between and during scenes are done seamlessly. They never feel abrupt or out of place, instead coming together to create an engaging and fun film that still tugs at the heartstrings.

 

Deadpool & Wolverine was, all in all, a good time. While long-time Marvel movie fans might get an extra something from watching this, I would recommend this film to anyone who enjoys superhero films and is not put off by its gruesome content warnings.

 

- Tayler Harrison

CSU Stanislaus

71ca42O2djL._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg

It Ends With Us

Directed by Justin Baldoni, 2024

The new movie It Ends with Us, directed by Justin Baldoni and based on the book written by Colleen Hoover, has stirred up much commotion since its release date on August 9th, 2024, from its turbulent plot line to the serious real-life issues it tackles. 

​

Some of the outcry about this movie is in regards to the costuming, specifically for Lily Blossom Bloom, the main character played by Blake Lively. There have been many negative responses about the excessive layering of her clothing, throwing off the seamless look of the costuming. Their color palette follows a scheme of autumnal hues, which I actually think go well with Lily’s red hair. However, I do agree that the layering of her clothes, specifically, was a little overdone, and I preferred the looks that young Lily was given instead. I also think that the casting for young Lily was remarkably well done, as Isabela Ferrer, who plays her, really does look like Lively, and even sounds similar to her as well. However, in addition to the criticism regarding the costuming, most of the discourse surrounding the film lies in its content.

​

In the introduction, the main character, Lily, meets a man named Ryle Kincaid (Justin Baldoni) on a rooftop. The film initially sets their encounter to play out like a typical “rom-com”–but that is definitely not the case. Instead, the movie takes a dark turn as it introduces themes of domestic violence. 

​

For example, in the first scene where Lily and Ryle make their introductions, Ryle is distressed and immediately shows signs of major aggression. If someone went into It Ends with Us completely blind to the source material, they may not recognize his behavior as being significant. However, knowing that this story is about domestic violence, fans of the book automatically notice the bright red flags waving at Lily from the start, foreshadowing what is sadly to come. Her predisposition to household violence is further foreshadowed by the flashback scenes of young Lily, where we learn her mother was also abused by her husband, framing her experience with domestic violence as intergenerational. However, Lily’s promise to her daughter at the end of the film that “it ends with them,” suggests that Lily will make sure these generational issues will be forced out of their lives–in part by confronting Ryle to consider what would happen if his actions were committed to their daughter.

​

I really liked the dual perspectives of how Lily views her relationship with Ryle, versus the reality of what happens. As the domestic violence takes place throughout the movie, Lily’s point of view is that Ryle is only hurting her by accident. Her distortion of the events make it difficult for the watcher to tell at first if his violence really is on purpose since she is in denial of the situation and does not believe that Ryle is abusing her. However, the movie eventually re-imagines those scenes neutrally to show what really happened, though it is already fairly obvious to the audience. The turning point of the film occurs with the confirming realization that Lily can finally see that Ryle is, in-fact, purposely hurting her.

​

Atlas Corrigan (Brandon Sklenar), Lily’s ex, portrays a heroic character for her as he notices Lily’s signs of being in a violent relationship right away. I enjoyed their dynamic as he tried to help her out of her abusive situation, personally rooting for the development of their relationship. I feel that if Lily is going to be with anyone, she should be with Atlas, which is highly suggested in the final scene.

​

The dynamic between Lily and Ryle’s sister, Allysa, is also very interesting because of her ability to remain loyal to both Lily and Ryle, despite their situation. She gives Lily an ultimatum to try and clarify her options. Typically, when people in relationships or friendships give the other ultimatums, it often leaves a sour taste in the mouths of both the viewers and the character being given it. However, in this case, the ultimatum was very emotional, depicting Allysa’s maturity and how she really cares about her best friend. Even though Allysa loves her brother and has compassion for why he is the way he is, she puts that aside in order to help Lily. Allysa tells her, “As his sister, I wish more than anything that you could find a way to forgive him. But, as your best friend, Lily, if you take him back, I will never speak to you again.” Often, in situations similar to this, many may expect the sister to automatically side with her brother and ruin the friendship because of family loyalty. However, Allysa’s character is refreshing in that she does not defend her brother simply because he is her sibling, and she acknowledges how wrong he is. 

​

I think It Ends with Us is definitely a really good movie to watch as it spreads awareness about domestic violence, and its storyline is another major draw. I would give this film a very high rating, and I strongly recommend others to go out and see it!

 

- Sarah Hernandez

CSU Stanislaus

Television Reviews

MV5BOTEzMzE5YTAtOGIzNy00MmFhLTg5OTAtNDRjZjkxZWQ2NmNiXkEyXkFqcGc_._V1_.jpg

A Good Girl's Guide to Murder

Created by Dolly Wells and Poppy Cogan, 2024

The 2024 Netflix adaptation of Holly Jackson’s A Good Girl’s Guide to Murder promised to take audiences by storm since the project’s announcement in September 2022. The series picks up in the small English town of Little Kilton five years after the murder of 17-year-old Andie Bell. Our main protagonist, Pip Fitz-Amobi (played by Emma Myers), has decided to investigate the murder for her senior project, with her primary goal being to prove the innocence of Sal Singh, Andie’s boyfriend who was deemed to be her killer and subsequently committed suicide. As the investigation progresses, Pip discovers that not all is as it seems. However, the measly, 6-episode season release brought with it a disappointing interpretation of Jackson’s nail-biting mystery series. Erased are the scenes in which Pip follows a breadcrumb trail of apathetic interviews, forcing her way through obstacles by calling drug dealers from burner phones, combing through old footage, and dissecting furtive details in photographic evidence. Instead, Pip’s cleverness is completely obscured by the ease in which she has every question answered, upfront, and with no other prompting except her mere presence.

​

It appears to me as though the modern film industry has begun to interpret adaptation as being synonymous with dilution—a dilution that is apparent in A Good Girl’s Guide to Murder. The age of the Sherlock Holmes detective tale has been traded in for a simplistic lack of media literacy, in which dialogue maps supplant actual clues for the sake of “easy consumerism.” Every suspect or possible witness that Pip approaches does not misdirect or reject her advances, but rather guides her with answers presented on a silver platter–even an experienced drug dealer immediately confesses his secrets to a teenage girl. The absolute absurdity of Pip’s lack of detective skills being rewarded with an open-and-shut case casts into doubt the validity of the police not having been able to solve Andie Bell’s murder five years prior. It is unfortunate that Netflix has senselessly riddled an otherwise unpredictable thriller with plot holes and a laughable script. It seems the only portrayal that bears any merit in comparison to its novelistic counterpart is Ravi Singh (played by Zain Iqbal). Ravi’s humor and ingenuity shines through amidst the weak attempts at an authentic British accent by Emma Myers and the far weaker attempts by the show’s producers at adhering to the capriciousness of the novel.

​

It is ironic that one of the only story “twists” that Netflix remained faithful to was Pip’s dog, Barney, dying. Although this does play a significant role in altering Pip’s character and shaping the rest of the series, I had been of the opinion that such results could have occurred without the death of the dog even before having watched the show. Yet, the unfortunate death of Barney was included in the series, displayed in even more explicit detail than in the book, rather than homing in on more fulfilling details such as the complexity of characters like Becca Bell or Elliot Ward—the misunderstood yet highly culpable killers. The neglect of expounding upon Ward’s mental state in kidnapping a girl that he convinces himself is Andie ends up settling into the finale as another depiction of a cut-and-paste villain. No empathy is procured for Ward, despite his ties to Pip as a second father figure and the father of her best friend, Cara.

​

Netflix has produced yet another example of a production company failing spectacularly at crafting a successful book adaptation, having not remained true to the complexity of the novel nor managed to craft something new and original. This is sadly no new phenomenon and is likely to continue to pervade the recent era of fast production for the sake of streaming companies’ profit; I have even heard some rumblings that the Netflix adaptation of Scott Westerfeld’s Uglies also warrants some criticism by fans of the original books. We must not lose all hope, however,

for there are some examples of successful adaptations still in existence, such as Normal People, One Day (including the recent Netflix mini-series), and The Hunger Games series.

​

While one would think that the oversimplification of Netflix’s adaptation would result in clear plot points and more time for decent pacing and character development, the opposite has occurred. The ingenious connections drawn between the story’s clues and the suspects’ secrets have become convoluted or utterly disregarded by the teen detective, expecting short and sweet answers to her interrogation questions at a moment’s notice–and she’s gotten them. The elimination of many of the novel’s subtler plot development, such as when Pip and Ravi reenact the original investigation’s report of how Sal killed Andie, results in pacing that grasps at straws for additional excitement. The character development of just about every individual throughout the story, except perhaps with the exception of Ravi or Andie Bell herself, has also been sorely underrepresented. Although I would highly recommend Holly Jackson’s A Good Girl’s Guide to Murder series, the television adaptation does not contain even an ounce of Jackson’s ingenuity.

​

- Schuyler Becker
CSU Stanislaus Alumna

Batman_Caped_Crusader_TV_Series-164766713-large.jpg

Batman: Caped Crusader

Created by Bruce Timm, 2024

When I saw that Amazon Prime was rebooting the original Batman cartoon as the Caped Crusader, I had my doubts. After all, J.J. Abrams is one of the project’s producers. After seeing a trailer for Batman: Caped Crusader, I was immediately excited. However, then skepticism sunk in–the kind of skepticism from burnt out optimism. I wanted to believe it was going to be good. I opened up Amazon Prime, crossed my fingers, took a deep breath, and began the first episode…

​

I’m here for it!

​

Everything about it warms my childhood spirit, despite my initial apprehension. One of my biggest hesitations with reboots is the question why: What else needs to be said that hasn’t been said already? Secondly, I personally feel most stories from the 80’s and 90’s haven’t aged well, and oftentimes the plastic surgery these stories need to be acceptable by today’s standards often renders the project a mess. The reboot was developed by the original Batman: The Animated Series producer and creator, Bruce Timm, who also did the Superman: The Animated Series of the late 90’s. Falling under the umbrella of Bad Robot productions, who hit their prime in the early aughts, I feared for this reboot as their other works have yet to capture that excitement again.

​

Yet Batman: Caped Crusader does have something new and significant to contribute to the ongoing conversation of Batman. For starters, the series subverts our expectations of characters, and gives creative voice to underrepresented groups. Often when a series includes race or gender swaps, it feels like pandering, with the inclusive character’s story inserted to meet some sort of equity standard. I am all in for bringing new voices to the table, but let them merely be there, and not just as placeholder for social justice. 

​

The commitment and effort towards inclusivity put into this show is not only present in the animation, but in the casting as well. Commissioner Gorden is a black man, voiced by Eric Morgan Stuart, and the show addresses the subtle pressures of this. His mixed daughter, Barbara Gorden (Kystal Joy Brown), is a character whose vibrancy matches her red-hair, and is a great addition as well. Her character is extremely logical, and acts in a method that is consistent with the overall context and tone of the show. It made me wonder why this character has never really been developed in the Batman franchise before. I also really enjoyed that they made Harvey Bullock a crooked cop, which is really convincing, especially when watching the old cartoons. I never liked the guy then, and I certainly don’t like him now. Even their reinterpretation of The Penguin, which happens right out the gate, clearly shows the care that went into this adjustment, which sets this show apart from the majority of reboots that we see now. When we finally are introduced to The Penguin, the gender swap feels natural and even implied, but I didn’t feel like it came out of nowhere.

​

The aesthetics of the characters are also amazing, down to the material of Batman’s costume and his leather gloves. The costume designs harken back to a familiar place we feel once existed, yet does not quite fit into any decade. Everyway that the series reapproaches each character makes sense, and often left me questioning why they weren’t represented like that from the beginning. Each character feels important no matter how small their screen time in this Batman’s world. 

​

I really enjoyed that it seemed like Batman (Hamish Linklaturi) himself was a character in a city of characters, and that Batman’s focus was to be on the right side of freaks. Let me say again, I like that the series feels there are no side characters–every character feels important to the greater story of Gotham. The show brings me back to the Batman Detective Comics, where the story was more noir and less dark. Batman: Caped Crusader has succeeded in building a universe that doesn’t feel like it needs to expand, or that the stakes need to get higher. In fact, it reminds the viewer that sometimes a good, simple, entertaining story is refreshing in a world of superhero high tensions.

​

Most of all, the series pulled off what many thought was impossible and in doing so changed a paradigm–having an entire story arc without The Joker! His absence allowed the introduction of Harley Quinn and her motives as a solid stand-alone character, and not just as a “side-kick.”

​

All in all, this is a great start to a franchise reboot, not only telling great stories, but adding depth and creatively to a superhero who desperately needed to be free from the darkness and brought back to the mystery of noir.

 

- Jeremiah Washington

CSU Stanislaus

bottom of page